Back to Blogs

How to Engage the Economic Buyer: 8 Mistakes That Stall B2B Deals

By Kavyashree SB, Technical Writer October 10, 2025 25 min read

A practical perspective for connecting this idea to your revenue team’s next move.

Infographic showing Economic Buyer Engagement: Source systems, Trusted data, Decision cadence, Leading indicators, and Revenue outcome connected as one revenue workflow.

To engage the economic buyer, the person with final authority to release budget, confirm early who that is, get introduced through your champion rather than around them, and bring a business case built on the buyer’s own numbers. Keep their involvement to one or two focused conversations and put their approval steps on a dated mutual action plan.

Below: how the economic buyer differs from the champion and technical buyer, how to identify one, eight mistakes and their fixes, a 30-minute meeting agenda, executive engagement in account-based selling, and how to check engagement in pipeline reviews. The research cited was published between 2020 and 2026; Revspire’s own data covers October 2025 to September 2026.

Last updated: 17 October 2026

What is an economic buyer?

The economic buyer is the person, or occasionally the committee or board, who decides whether a purchase gets funded at all. In its May 2026 guide to qualifying the economic buyer, MEDDICC describes this as the person who “has the final say on whether your product, service, or solution receives any budget.” The economic buyer is the E in MEDDIC, MEDDICC and MEDDPICC qualification.

The role is older than MEDDIC. Robert Miller and Stephen Heiman’s Strategic Selling , first published in 1985, named four buying influences: the economic buyer, the user buyer, the technical buyer and the coach (Close, updated June 2026). Both frameworks make the same point: titles do not tell you who decides.

MEDDICC’s guide lists practical tests. A real economic buyer can veto, start or stop the project whatever your champion thinks; is focused on the organisation’s goals and takes part in quarterly and annual planning; can find money that is not already in a budget line; carries profit-and-loss responsibility; and signs or approves the contract. It also warns against two opposite errors: stopping at the budget holder, who manages access to a budget but cannot decide to spend it, and assuming the most senior person you can name, such as the CEO, is the one making the call.

Economic buyer vs champion vs technical buyer vs user buyer

Larger deals usually involve all four roles, plus procurement. The economic buyer can say yes to the money; the others shape whether they will. If you are unsure who plays which role, a stakeholder map template forces the question for each named contact.

Role

What they decide

What they need from you

Typical titles (examples only)

Economic buyer

Whether the purchase is funded, and whether it goes ahead at all

The business outcome, the cost of acting and of not acting, risk, time to value

Business-unit head, COO, CFO, CRO; sometimes a steering committee

Champion

Nothing alone, but argues for you when you are not in the room

A case they can present internally, and a personal reason to win

A director or manager who owns the problem

Technical buyer

Whether the solution meets requirements: can veto, cannot approve

Proof on security, integration, legal and compliance points

IT, security, legal, engineering

User buyer

Whether the product will be adopted day to day

A credible view of how their work changes

Team leads and the people who will use it

Procurement

Commercial terms and vendor approval

Clean paperwork, pricing logic, vendor-risk documents

Procurement or vendor management

On small deals the champion and the economic buyer can be the same person. On large ones they rarely are, and the champion’s job is to bring the economic buyer to a confident decision. Our guide to champion enablement covers how to tell a real champion from a friendly coach.

Why does economic buyer engagement decide B2B deals?

The clearest data comes from recorded sales conversations. In a Gong Labs analysis by Devin Reed (December 2020, updated March 2026) of 9,056 opportunities, decision-maker involvement was associated with a 233% higher win rate on enterprise deals, defined as cycles over 90 days and deals of $100k or more. Gong counted anyone titled VP, C-level or managing director as a decision maker, which is broader than the economic buyer, but the second finding matters more: win rates were highest when the decision maker acted as the approver rather than the evaluator, and fell when they were involved in too many calls.

Qualification data points the same way. In the Ebsta and Pavilion 2023 B2B Sales Benchmark Report, based on 3.2 million opportunities at 364 companies, top performers showed 85% usage of the economic buyer criterion in MEDDPICC, against 29% for mid performers and 8% for low performers. The report does not define the tiers or the usage measure, so read it as a pattern, not proof of cause.

Meanwhile the decision is spread across many people, and sellers never meet a lot of them. Forrester’s State of Business Buying 2026 (21 January 2026) puts a typical buying decision at 13 internal stakeholders and nine external influencers, and says procurement is a decision-maker in 53% of buying cycles. Many of the people who shape the decision never meet the seller: in the Edelman and LinkedIn 2025 B2B Thought Leadership Impact Report (summarised by Edelman on 26 June 2025), 71% of “hidden buyers” in finance, legal, compliance, procurement and operations said they have little or no interaction with sales teams.

How do you identify the economic buyer?

Nobody introduces themselves as the economic buyer, so ask questions that reveal the decision path rather than asking “are you the decision maker?” Useful questions for discovery and for your champion:

  • “Who signed off the last purchase of a similar size, and how long did it take?”
  • “After you recommend a vendor, what happens next, and who could stop it?”
  • “Whose budget would this come from, and whose targets does the problem affect?”
  • “Is there a spending level above which finance or a committee has to approve?”
  • “Who would need to agree that solving this is worth doing this year?”

Then test the name you get against the MEDDICC criteria above: veto power, profit-and-loss ownership, access to unbudgeted funds and a part in the contract. Record in your CRM not just the name, but how you know: “confirmed by the economic buyer in a meeting” is evidence; “the champion says it’s her boss” is a hypothesis. Remember that the economic buyer can change with deal size. For example, a purchase one team lead can approve at $15,000 may need a vice president and the CFO at $150,000.

The economic buyer engagement mistakes that stall deals

Eight mistakes keep sellers away from the economic buyer, or lose the economic buyer late in the deal. Each comes with a fix, and a summary table follows.

1. Taking the champion’s word for who decides

Champions often believe they, or their manager, will make the call. Sometimes they are right. Often the real approval sits one level higher, or with a finance committee the champion has never had to convince. The opposite error is just as common: naming the CEO because they are the most senior person on the org chart.

Fix: qualify the economic buyer against the tests above, ask the champion to walk you through the last comparable purchase, and mark the economic buyer field “unconfirmed” until someone has heard it from the economic buyer, or from the paperwork.

2. Meeting the economic buyer only at the proposal stage

When the first contact is a pricing review, the economic buyer sees the deal for the first time at the moment of greatest risk. Any disagreement about the problem, the priority or the budget surfaces when there is no time left to fix it. Gong’s data suggests the opposite mistake also costs deals: dragging senior people into every call wears them out.

Fix: plan two economic buyer conversations. The first, early in the evaluation, confirms the problem, the outcome they expect and how they will decide. The second, near the end, asks for approval against the criteria they gave you. Between the two, keep them informed through the champion and through written updates, not more meetings.

3. Going around the champion to get access

Emailing the economic buyer directly after the champion says “leave it with me” can get you a meeting and lose you the champion. The better route is to make the meeting good for the champion: it reduces their risk and makes them look prepared.

Fix: ask for access in a way that serves the champion, for example: “Before we put a proposal in front of your VP, could we spend 20 minutes with her to check we’ve understood what she needs? I’ll send you a draft agenda first, and you lead the conversation.” Offer a matching senior person from your side, which turns the request into an executive-to-executive conversation rather than a seller asking to skip a level. If the champion will not or cannot arrange it, treat that as a qualification signal about their influence.

4. Bringing a product demo to a business decision

Economic buyers rarely care how a feature works. Gong Labs recommends preparing for three questions decision makers usually ask: how the deal affects their strategic goals, how long until it pays off, and who will own it. MEDDICC’s guide adds cost and ease of use for the people who will use the product.

Fix: build the economic buyer conversation around one page: the problem in their numbers, the outcome, the time to value, the owner on their side, the cost and the main risk with how you will handle it. Keep the demo for the evaluators.

5. A business case finance cannot check

Finance leaders test vendor maths before they approve it. In Wynter’s 2025 survey of 100 CFOs and VPs of finance at B2B SaaS companies with more than $50M in revenue (the page itself is undated), 58% said they do not trust vendor ROI calculations and 78% verify their team’s chosen vendor on their own. Cost (76%) and ROI (48%) led their decision criteria, and 66% look at total cost of ownership over three-to-five-year commitments. Only 16% lead vendor selection end to end; 30% described their role as final approval.

Fix: build the case from the customer’s own baseline, show the formula, give a low and a high case, and include every cost: licences, implementation and the buyer’s own staff time. Our post on selling to the CFO goes deeper on finance conversations. Here is the shape of a case a CFO can check:

Line (hypothetical worked example)

Where the number comes from

Low case

High case

New support agents hired per year

Customer HR plan

20

20

Weeks of ramp saved per new hire

Assumption, to be tested in a pilot

2

4

Fully loaded cost per agent-week

Customer finance

$1,500

$1,500

Annual value (20 × weeks saved × $1,500)

Calculated

$60,000

$120,000

Three-year value

Calculated

$180,000

$360,000

Three-year cost: $45,000 a year in licences, $15,000 implementation, 100 staff hours at $75

Proposal and customer finance

$157,500

$157,500

Three-year net value

Calculated

$22,500

$202,500

Every figure in that table is invented for illustration. The point is the structure: the low case barely clears its cost, the table says so, and each input has an owner who can check it. A CFO who can see that is far more likely to trust the high case than one handed a single ROI multiple.

6. Treating “do nothing” as a neutral option

The economic buyer’s real alternative is usually not a competitor but keeping things as they are. Forrester’s State of Business Buying 2024 (4 December 2024) found that 86% of B2B purchases stall during the buying process. Research by Matt Dixon and Ted McKenna, summarised by Challenger in February 2024, drew on 2.5 million recorded sales conversations and found that 40% to 60% of lost deals ended in no decision; where indecision was high, win rates fell to 6%. Fear of making a mistake drove indecision more than fear of missing out.

Sellers find this the hardest conversation to have. In Revspire’s sales skills gap benchmark (more than 2,000 scored AI role-plays, October 2025 to September 2026), the status quo objection (“our current process works fine”) scored lowest of five objection types, at 2.9 out of 5. And CRM data hides the problem: in the Revspire win rate and sales cycle benchmark for the same period, only 10% of lost deals were tagged “no decision”, far below what call-recording research finds.

Fix: put the cost of waiting in the business case (what the problem costs per quarter, in the buyer’s numbers), make a clear recommendation rather than a menu, and take risk off the table with a phased start, a pilot with agreed success criteria, or clear exit terms.

7. Leaving nothing for the economic buyer to read

Economic buyers often decide from what their team forwards to them. In Revspire’s digital sales room benchmark (about 40 B2B companies, October 2025 to September 2026), 80% of deal rooms gained a new viewer after the first share, meaning the first recipient passed the room on to a colleague. In the 14 days before a won deal closed, 80% of buyer views went to the proposal and the implementation plan. These are observed patterns, not proof that a room wins a deal, but they show what late-stage readers look at: the price and the rollout, not the pitch deck.

Fix: write the first screen of whatever you share for the person who was not on the call: a one-paragraph summary of the problem, the business case and the agreed next steps. Keep the current proposal and a dated implementation plan at the top, and earlier material one click away.

8. Keeping approval steps off the mutual action plan

Most mutual action plans track the seller’s tasks: demos, proposals, paperwork. The steps that slip are on the buyer’s side, and the economic buyer’s approval is usually one of them. In Revspire’s mutual action plan benchmark (October 2025 to September 2026), buyers owned only 20% of plan milestones. Deals with a recorded plan were won 35% of the time against 28% without one, and deals above $50k closed in a median of 85 days with a plan against 120 without. Again, that is an association: teams that write plans may also qualify harder.

Fix: add the economic buyer meeting, budget approval, procurement, security review, legal review and signature to the plan, each with a named owner at the customer and a date, and agree them on a call rather than by email.

Economic buyer mistakes: warning signs and fixes

Mistake

Warning sign in the deal

Fix

Taking the champion’s word for who decides

Economic buyer field filled in, but nobody has spoken to them

Test against veto, P&L and contract criteria; mark “unconfirmed” until verified

Meeting them only at the proposal stage

First economic buyer meeting is a pricing review

Plan an early “confirm the problem” meeting and a late approval meeting

Going around the champion

Direct outreach after the champion said “leave it with me”

Ask for access in a way that helps the champion; offer executive-to-executive

Demoing to a business decision

Economic buyer meeting agenda is a product walkthrough

One page: problem, outcome, time to value, owner, cost, risk

A business case finance cannot check

Single ROI multiple, vendor-supplied inputs, no costs on the buyer side

Customer baseline, visible formula, low and high case, full cost

Ignoring the status quo

“We’ll revisit next quarter”; no cost of inaction in the case

Quantify waiting; recommend one option; offer a phased start

Nothing for the economic buyer to read

Champion asks you to “send something I can forward”

A summary page written for the absent reader; proposal and plan on top

Approval steps missing from the plan

Close date set, but no budget approval or signatory on the plan

Buyer-owned approval milestones with names and dates

What should you bring to an economic buyer meeting?

Ask for 30 minutes, send the agenda through the champion a few days ahead, and let the champion open. A workable agenda:

  • Minutes 0-5, purpose: what the champion’s team has found, and what you want to check with them.
  • Minutes 5-15, their view: the outcome they need, by when, how they will measure it, and what happens if nothing changes.
  • Minutes 15-22, the proposal on one page: outcome, timeline, owner on their side, cost and the main risk.
  • Minutes 22-27, the decision: the criteria they will use, who else must agree, the approval steps and what would make them say no.
  • Minutes 27-30, next step: one agreed action, with an owner and a date, added to the mutual action plan.

Questions that work well with economic buyers:

  • “What would make this the right thing to fund this year rather than next?”
  • “How will you judge, twelve months from now, whether this was a good decision?”
  • “What has stopped similar projects here before?”
  • “Who else needs to be comfortable before you approve this?”
  • “What would you need to see from us to say yes?”

Bring a senior person from your side if the economic buyer is a vice president or above. MEDDICC’s guide recommends having a sales leader in economic buyer meetings because a leader can make commitments a seller cannot. Brief them the day before and give them one job, such as committing to the implementation timeline.

How do you sell to the CFO?

When the CFO is the economic buyer or final approver, sell the investment, not the product: show cost and value by quarter, how soon it pays back, which assumption decides the case, what could go wrong and how you limit it, and what the company gives up to fund it. A CFO judges your proposal the way they judge any other use of cash.

Money is available but contested. In Gartner’s October 2025 survey of more than 300 CFOs and finance leaders, technology budgets were set to rise for 75% of CFOs in 2026, and sales and IT expected the largest increases (Gartner, 10 February 2026). Yet in an August 2025 Gartner survey of more than 200 CFOs, 56% ranked enterprise-wide cost optimisation among their top five priorities for 2026 (Gartner, 10 December 2025). Your proposal competes for the same budget as every other request.

What CFOs evaluate

The CFO’s question

What to bring

When does cash go out, and when does value arrive?

Costs and benefits by quarter, with benefits starting at adoption, not signature

How long until it pays back?

Payback in months for the low and high case

What will it really cost?

Licences, implementation, staff time, renewal increases, exit costs

Is it in the plan, and what does it displace?

The budget line that pays, and any tool or spend it replaces

What if it goes wrong?

The deciding assumption, how a pilot tests it, and the exit point

Who owns the benefit?

A named owner on the customer side and the metric they will report

A business-case structure finance can check

  • The decision and your recommendation, in one sentence.
  • The baseline: the problem in the customer’s numbers, from their systems.
  • Options: do nothing, your proposal, and a smaller first phase, with the cost of waiting per quarter.
  • Costs and benefits by quarter for the full term, each benefit with an owner and a source.
  • Payback, net value and the break-even assumption.
  • Risks, mitigations and the approvals still to come.

Payback and risk: a worked example

Take the hypothetical case under mistake 5 and add one realistic detail: implementation takes three months, licences are billed from day one and value starts in month four.

  • Cost before any value: $15,000 implementation, $7,500 staff time and three months of licences at $3,750: $33,750.
  • Net gain per month from month four: monthly value minus licence, so $5,000 − $3,750 = $1,250 in the low case and $10,000 − $3,750 = $6,250 in the high case.
  • Payback: $33,750 ÷ $1,250 = 27 months after go-live, month 30 of a 36-month term, in the low case; $33,750 ÷ $6,250 = about 5.4 months, roughly month 9, in the high case.
  • Three-year net value: $7,500 low and $172,500 high, against $22,500 and $202,500 in the earlier table, because three months of value disappear.
  • Break-even: over three years the case breaks even at about 1.9 weeks of ramp saved per new hire. Below that, it loses money.

That is what a CFO wants: the one assumption that decides the case. Offer a pilot that tests it, with success criteria and an exit point, or a phased start that brings value forward, and admit that a 30-month payback on a 36-month term is weak. Date the remaining approvals. In Revspire’s mutual action plan benchmark, security and legal review completion was the milestone most often overdue, in 34% of plans: an observed pattern, but a reason to schedule those reviews before the CFO meeting, not after it.

Questions to expect from a CFO

  • “What happens if we do nothing, or do this next year?”
  • “Which budget pays for it, and what are we not funding instead?”
  • “What is the payback, and which assumption moves it most?”
  • “What does it cost over the term, including our staff time and renewal increases?”
  • “What can we switch off or stop paying for?”
  • “Who on our side owns the result, and how will we know in six months?”
  • “What are the exit terms if it does not work?”

Answer them in writing beforehand, and rehearse the price conversation with our guide to handling price objections.

Executive engagement in account-based selling

In account-based selling, the economic buyer of today’s deal is one of several executives you need over years of expansion. Executive engagement then becomes part of the account plan, not a step in one opportunity.

  • Name an executive sponsor for each top-tier account. A vice president or C-level leader from your side who meets their counterpart a few times a year, on the customer’s priorities rather than your product.
  • Write a one-page executive brief. The account’s stated priorities (from its annual report or earnings calls), what you have delivered so far, and the one thing you want from the next meeting.
  • Keep the account executive in charge. The sponsor does not open new threads alone, is briefed before every meeting and debriefs the account team afterwards.
  • Rehearse the specific meeting, not generic skills. Generic training rarely prepares a rep for a particular CFO’s objections. Practise with that account’s priorities and likely pushback. In the Revspire skills gap benchmark, closing (3.0 out of 5) and objection handling (3.2) were the lowest-scoring skills, and those are exactly what an economic buyer meeting tests.
  • Set the standard before you configure tools. Decide what “economic buyer engaged” means at each stage, then build the CRM fields and reports to match, rather than letting a tool’s default fields define the process.

How do you know the economic buyer is engaged?

Activity is not engagement: emails to a champion say nothing about the person who approves the spend. Track evidence that the economic buyer is involved and agrees.

  • The economic buyer is named and confirmed by the economic buyer or by the contract process, not only by the champion.
  • At least one meeting with the economic buyer took place before the proposal stage.
  • Their decision criteria are written in the opportunity in their words.
  • The economic buyer, or someone in finance, has opened the business case or proposal (deal room analytics show this).
  • Approval milestones on the mutual action plan have named owners at the customer and dates.
  • The buyer side is still reading. In the Revspire digital sales room benchmark, after 20 days with no buyer view the win rate fell below half the overall rate, which makes 20 days of silence a sensible alert.

To set a baseline, pull the closed deals from your last two quarters, mark whether the economic buyer was met and at which stage, and compare win rates and cycle lengths. Then add two questions to every weekly pipeline review: “Who is the economic buyer, and how do we know?” and “What will change with them in the next seven days?” Review a sample of lost deals each quarter to check whether economic buyer access was the real loss reason.

Where software helps, and where it does not

No tool gets you a meeting with an economic buyer; a credible champion and a clear business case do. Software helps with the parts that are easy to lose track of. Revspire, which publishes this guide, makes digital sales rooms with buying-committee stakeholder mapping, mutual action plans with owners and due dates, secure content sharing and buyer-engagement analytics that show who has viewed what. Its AI sales training and coaching lets reps practise a specific buyer conversation, such as a CFO pushing back on price, with AI scoring of how they handled it. Many other tools cover parts of this, and a disciplined team can run the same process with a shared document, a spreadsheet and a calendar.

To put economic buyer approval steps on every large deal, start with our mutual action plan template and add the budget approval, procurement and signature milestones from mistake 8.

Frequently asked questions

What is the economic buyer in MEDDIC?

The economic buyer is the E in MEDDIC, MEDDICC and MEDDPICC: the person with final authority to fund the purchase. MEDDICC’s qualification tests are whether they can veto or start the project, own profit and loss, find unbudgeted money and sign or approve the contract. It can occasionally be a committee or board.

What is the difference between a technical buyer and an economic buyer?

A technical buyer, such as IT, security or legal, checks whether your solution meets requirements and can block it, but cannot approve the spend. The economic buyer decides whether the purchase goes ahead and can overrule a lukewarm evaluation. You need the technical buyer’s “no objection” and the economic buyer’s “yes”.

Is the economic buyer always the CFO?

No. It is usually the leader whose budget pays for the purchase and whose results depend on it, such as a business-unit head or COO. Finance often joins above a spending threshold: in Wynter’s 2025 survey, 30% of finance leaders described their role as final approval and only 16% led vendor selection end to end.

How do you respond when a prospect says “I’m not the decision maker”?

Treat it as useful information, not a brush-off. Ask who is, what that person will need to see to say yes, and how you can help your contact make the case, for example with a one-page summary they can forward. Then ask whether a short meeting with the decision maker, with your contact leading it, would make their job easier.

What content do economic buyers want?

Short, checkable material: a one-page summary of the problem and outcome, a business case built on their own numbers with low and high cases, a dated implementation plan with owners, and references from similar companies. In Revspire’s deal room data, late-stage buyer attention went mostly to the proposal and the implementation plan rather than to pitch material.

How do you sell to a CFO?

Present the purchase as an investment: costs and benefits by quarter, payback in months for a low and a high case, the assumption that decides the case, and the risks with how you will limit them. Build the numbers from the customer’s own baseline and include their staff time. Expect questions about what happens if they do nothing, which budget pays and what the exit terms are.

Sources

Read more Revspire articles